ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Cleidocranial dysplasia with preserved function under conservative management: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is a rare autosomal dominant skeletal disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the RUNX2 gene and characterized by delayed closure of cranial sutures, clavicular hypoplasia, and dental abnormalities. The clinical phenotype is highly heterogeneous, and data on the long-term natural history of CCD with preserved function remain limited. Methods: We reviewed the longitudinal clinical data of a male child with genetically confirmed CCD carrying a RUNX2 c.631C > T (p.R211W) variant. CCD-specific evaluation was initiated at approximately 4 years of age because of persistent delayed anterior fontanelle closure and clavicular abnormalities. Assessments included physical examination, cranial CT/MRI, chest imaging, panoramic dental radiography, whole-exome sequencing with parental validation, and endocrine follow-up. Conclusion: This case supports individualized conservative management for selected patients with CCD who have preserved function despite structural abnormalities. Longitudinal multidisciplinary follow-up is essential for guiding dental, endocrine, orthopedic, and functional management. Discussion: Despite typical skeletal and dental manifestations, the patient maintained preserved shoulder and upper limb function through 12 years of age, without recurrent fractures, persistent pain, functional limitation, or need for orthopedic or thoracic surgical intervention. A function-oriented conservative management strategy remained appropriate. Height SDS improved during rhGH-related follow-up; however, this observation should be interpreted cautiously because growth may also have been influenced by hypothyroidism, thyroid hormone replacement, normal development, and pubertal maturation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.