ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use does not impair efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is routinely used to manage chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its potential to promote immunosuppressive tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) has raised theoretical concerns about compromising the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We aimed to evaluate the real-world association between G-CSF use and survival outcomes in this setting. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who initiated first- or later-line chemoimmunotherapy at a tertiary academic center between 2018 and 2021. Multivariable Cox regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to adjust for key prognostic confounders. Results: Among 120 enrolled patients, 57 (47.5%) received G-CSF during treatment. With a median follow-up of 22.6 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.9 months in the G-CSF group versus 9.6 months in the non-G-CSF group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.60-1.58; P = 0.92). The median overall survival (OS) was 17.6 versus 15.3 months, respectively (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.50-1.98; P = 0.99). In multivariable analysis, G-CSF administration was not independently associated with PFS (adjusted HR [aHR] = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.60-1.93; P = 0.80) or OS (aHR = 1.96, 95% CI: 0.80-4.78; P = 0.14). IPTW-adjusted analyses confirmed these null associations (PFS: HR = 1.30, P = 0.85; OS: HR = 1.00, P = 0.95). Discussion: In this real-world cohort, no statistically significant association between G-CSF use and survival outcomes was observed among patients with advanced NSCLC treated with chemoimmunotherapy. Further prospective studies are warranted to better define the potential risks and benefits of G-CSF in this setting, particularly regarding its long-term association with survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.