ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026
PUDU (pipeline for universal diversity unveiling): an accessible end-to-end workflow for taxonomic profiling and ecological visualization of environmental microbiomes across amplicon, shotgun, and long-read sequencing.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Environmental microbiome research has advanced through three complementary sequencing modalities, targeted 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, whole-genome shotgun (WGS) metagenomics, and long-read full-length 16S rRNA profiling, each supported by distinct toolsets with heterogeneous outputs, variable configurations, and different levels of reproducibility documentation. Existing pipelines are typically modality-specific, require substantial configuration expertise, or produce outputs that need further custom scripting before standard ecological analyses can begin. This analytical fragmentation introduces avoidable technical variability and complicates cross-study reproducibility and comparability. PUDU addresses this by integrating all three modalities into a single reproducible workflow with simplified configuration, harmonized outputs across classifiers, and direct compatibility with downstream ecological analysis frameworks. Results: We present PUDU (Pipeline for Universal Diversity Unveiling), a modular Snakemake workflow that supports amplicon (short-read 16S), shotgun metagenomics (WGS), and long-read 16S analyses from raw reads to standardized outputs for downstream microbial ecology. PUDU performs technology-aware preprocessing and centralized quality control, and integrates established taxonomic approaches, including DADA2 for amplicons, Emu for full-length 16S long reads, and Kraken2/Bracken and Centrifuger for WGS. Across methods, PUDU produces harmonized count and relative-abundance tables at user-defined taxonomic ranks, Krona files, and a standardized Phyloseq-compatible R object to streamline diversity analyses and statistical workflows. PUDU also provides an integrated Shiny interface for metadata-aware alpha/beta diversity, ordination, community composition, and shared-taxa exploration with exportable figures and taxa tables. We demonstrate PUDU on two publicly available environmental datasets spanning rhizosphere WGS and long-read marine sediment 16S, yielding broadly consistent community-level patterns across classifiers (Spearman ρ = 0.936 at phylum level; PERMANOVA R Conclusion: PUDU is an end-to-end, reproducible, and extensible framework that enables standardized taxonomic profiling and ecology-oriented analysis across sequencing modalities. By combining harmonized outputs, Phyloseq interoperability, and an integrated visualization layer, PUDU facilitates reproducible, standardized, and comparable environmental microbiome analysis from raw reads to interpretable ecological insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.