SynthesisFrontiers in oral health2026
Vitamin D as a candidate host susceptibility factor in sugar-driven oral dysbiosis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Potential effects of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation on oral and systemic health outcomes.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) represent a modifiable dietary factor that promotes oral dysbiosis by supplying fermentable sugars and generating low-pH conditions that favor acidogenic and acid-tolerant biofilms. Vitamin D plays a biologically significant role in oral host defense through regulation of the epithelial barrier, induction of antimicrobial peptides, immune modulation, inflammatory control, and mineral metabolism. However, the extent to which vitamin D modifies the SSB -oral microbiome -disease pathway in humans remains unclear. Methods: This narrative-conceptual review employed structured evidence mapping. Relevant literature was identified through PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection, with additional sources obtained via citation and hand searching. Evidence was categorized into predefined domains: SSB/free-sugar exposure and oral outcomes; sugar exposure and oral microbiome characteristics; vitamin D status and oral health outcomes; vitamin D-related host-defense mechanisms; vitamin D and human oral microbiome evidence; and proposed SSB × vitamin D interaction pathways. A PRISMA-ScR-style flow diagram documented the process of evidence identification and selection, resulting in the inclusion of 90 sources. Evidence interpretation followed a tiered approach. Results: The most robust evidence indicates an association between frequent SSB/free-sugar exposure and caries-related outcomes. Human microbiome studies suggest that high sugar intake may be linked to dysbiotic shifts, although results differ depending on sampling site, study design, and analytical methods. Evidence connecting vitamin D to caries and periodontal outcomes is suggestive but remains heterogeneous. Direct human evidence relating 25(OH)D status to oral microbiome trajectories or SSB × vitamin D interaction models is limited. Mechanistic studies support biological plausibility but do not establish causality in humans. Discussion: Vitamin D should be considered a candidate susceptibility factor and a potential proxy marker for broader behavioral, socioeconomic, metabolic, and inflammatory risk environments. Future longitudinal studies are needed to jointly assess SSB exposure, standardized 25(OH)D levels, plaque-site microbiome trajectories, confounders, and incident oral outcomes. Current practice recommendations continue to emphasize reducing SSB consumption, encouraging non-sugary alternatives, promoting fluoride use, maintaining oral hygiene, and supporting preventive dental care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.