ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The relationship between perceived educational opportunity fairness and social trust: an empirical study based on cognition, emotion and developmental expectation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between perceived educational opportunity fairness and social trust is a crucial issue concerning social stability and institutional identification. However, existing research has predominantly focused on the direct relationship of educational attainment, with few studies providing a granular analysis of the complex psychological mechanisms through which fairness perceptions are transformed into social trust. Utilizing data from the 2023 Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS), this study employs Ordered Logit regression, Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), and stepwise regression to construct an integrated multiple mediation model encompassing cognition, emotion, and expectation. Furthermore, the moderating role of internet usage intensity in this process is examined. The findings indicate that: (1) Perceived educational opportunity fairness significantly predicts higher levels of social trust, a conclusion that remains robust across multiple sensitivity tests; (2) Mediation analysis reveals that educational opportunity fairness indirectly influences social trust through three distinct pathways: sense of social fairness (cognitive), subjective well-being (emotional), and subjective social mobility expectations (developmental expectation); (3) Moderation analysis shows that internet usage intensity significantly weakens the positive association between educational opportunity fairness and social trust. Specifically, the higher the intensity of internet use, the weaker the positive effect of fairness on trust; (4) Overall, the relationship between educational opportunity fairness and social trust is characterized by a multi-path mechanism of "cognition-emotion-developmental expectation." This paper reveals the social and psychological contexts underlying the links between educational opportunity fairness and social trust. It suggests that while optimizing the allocation of educational resources, policymakers should also refine the mechanisms for guaranteeing fair educational opportunities. In the pursuit of balanced resource allocation, emphasis should be placed not only on objective inputs but also on ensuring the transparency and justice of distribution procedures, thereby eliminating the interference of non-effort factors such as household registration (hukou) and family background.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.