Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42643367›Full record

ArticleLandscape ecology2026

Are forestry clearcuts ecological traps for caribou?

Tazarve Gharajehdaghipour, Katie Tjaden-McClement, Tyler B Muhly, Jan F Kamler, Zoe Konanz, A Cole Burton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Landscape ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tazarve GharajehdaghipourDepartment of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-7597-4902
Katie Tjaden-McClementDepartment of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2948-0717
Tyler B MuhlyDepartment of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6659-2008
Jan F KamlerWildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4148-2088
Zoe KonanzDepartment of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-4426-3802
A Cole BurtonDepartment of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8799-3847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Woodland caribou ( Objectives: We hypothesized clearcuts could exacerbate predation risk by functioning as ecological traps in low-productivity landscapes, drawing caribou during summer when nutritional demands are high. We predicted caribou would select clearcuts as or more strongly than other landcovers, with clearcuts providing comparable or greater forage but imposing fitness costs. Methods: Using step-selection functions, we analyzed habitat selection for 71 GPS-collared caribou in west-central British Columbia, Canada. We assessed forage availability through vegetation surveys at 56 paired clearcut and uncut plots, and inferred predation risk from wolf ( Results: Caribou selected regenerating (≤ 25 years old) clearcuts as or more strongly than other landcovers, whereas older clearcuts (26-39 years old) were used neutrally or avoided. Compared to paired uncut areas, forage was greater in regenerating clearcuts, but not in older clearcuts. Predation risk was elevated in clearcuts and near roads, with higher activity of wolves (clearcuts), coyotes (roads), and black bears (both). Conclusions: We provided partial evidence that regenerating clearcuts may function as ecological traps during summer in low-productivity landscapes. Elevated predation risk does not necessarily equate to reduced fitness, and alternative mechanisms (e.g., risk-sensitive foraging) require further investigation. Regardless, selection of high-risk clearcuts by caribou represents an understudied pathway potentially contributing to population declines. We recommend limiting new clearcutting and improving protection of caribou summer ranges. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10980-026-02411-1.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic disturbanceFitnessForageHabitat selectionLand-use changePredation risk

Identifiers

PMID42643367
PMCPMC13503452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.