ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Perceptions and Experiences of Barriers to Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Among Pregnant Women: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To provide a nuanced understanding of the multi-factorial barriers to pelvic floor muscle training from the lived experiences of pregnant women and to generate actionable insights that can transform current antenatal care practices to better support maternal adherence. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in August 2025. Participants were recruited from a tertiary hospital using purposive sampling based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The sample size was guided by the principle of data saturation. An interview guide was developed based on the Protection Motivation Theory, and data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The collected data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step method to identify and refine key themes. Results: Three themes were identified in this study: mixed information sources, negative appraisal process, and maladaptive patterns. These themes strongly reflect the real-world barriers to pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy. Conclusion: This study revealed the real-world barriers and genuine needs of pregnant women regarding pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy, transcending the limitations of traditional health education. These findings not only highlight the necessity of shifting the focus from postpartum rehabilitation to antenatal prevention but also provide an empirical basis for developing more individualized, woman-centered prenatal care interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.