ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Individualized VMAT lattice radiotherapy on a standard flattening-filter linear accelerator for advanced bulky tumors: a retrospective feasibility and early clinical experience.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Advanced bulky tumors cause pain, hemorrhage, and functional impairment, but their volume, hypoxic core, and proximity to organs at risk limit dose escalation with conventional radiotherapy. Lattice radiotherapy (LRT) delivers ablative doses to intratumoral vertices while sparing peripheral tissue. We evaluated personalized LRT on standard flattening-filter (FF) linacs, alone or with radiotherapy. Methods: Seven patients (8 sites) with advanced bulky tumors treated February-November 2025 using 6 MV VMAT in FF mode were retrospectively reviewed. LRT (1-5 fractions of 6-15 Gy) was individualized by performance status, prior therapy, and tumor geometry; additional radiotherapy was at physician discretion. Co-primary endpoints were symptom relief (NRS, analgesic use, tumor-related symptoms) and local disease control; acute toxicity was secondary. Results: Median age was 69 years, median ECOG 2 (1-3), and mean tumor volume 370.7 cc (101.8-792.4 cc). All patients completed planned LRT. Symptom improvement occurred in 6 of 8 sites (75%), usually within two weeks. At median follow-up of 8 months (4-12), partial response (PR) was achieved in 5 of 8 sites (62.5%), stable disease (SD) in 2 (25.0%), and progressive disease (PD) in 1 (12.5%); the disease control rate (DCR = CR + PR + SD) was 7/8 (87.5%), with no complete response (CR) observed. Acute toxicity occurred in 3 patients (all grade 1-2, mainly fatigue and mild dermatitis); no grade ≥3 events occurred. Conclusion: Personalized LRT on FF linacs was feasible and well tolerated, with encouraging early palliative benefit in this small, heterogeneous cohort, supporting prospective evaluation with standardized symptom-assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.