ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Non-ablative fractional 1540-nm Er:glass laser for the treatment of striae gravidarum: a case series.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Striae gravidarum (SG) is a form of striae distensae for which no single modality reliably and completely corrects the lesions, and high-level evidence remains limited. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes and safety of the 1540-nm non-ablative fractional Er:glass laser (NAFL) for SG and aimed to add real-world data in Chinese (Fitzpatrick III-IV) women. Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the first cohort of consecutive postpartum women with abdominal SG who began 1540-nm NAFL treatment in our department on 31 March 2022. Efficacy was independently graded by three dermatologists who were blinded to treatment details, using a quartile improvement scale (0-3) and the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS); the three ratings were averaged, and inter-rater agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Patient-reported satisfaction (5-point unipolar scale), pain, and adverse events were also recorded. Results: Eight patients were analyzed. The mean quartile improvement score was 1.79 ± 0.78 (corresponding to mild-to-moderate improvement) and the mean GAIS was 2.29 ± 0.88 (between "improved" and "much improved"). Inter-rater agreement was good to excellent (ICC = 0.82 and 0.93, respectively). All patients reported satisfaction with the outcome. Adverse events were limited to tolerable intraprocedural pain, transient erythema, subcutaneous petechiae (1 patient), and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (3 patients), all of which resolved. Conclusion: In this small, uncontrolled series, the 1540-nm NAFL appeared to be well tolerated and may provide cosmetic improvement in SG. These preliminary observations require confirmation in larger, controlled studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.