ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Change detection in audio-visual space: neural evidence for age effects.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The ability to perceive spatial changes is crucial for everyday life. However, the effects of age on multisensory integration in spatial change detection are still less researched. Here, we investigated whether audio-visual stimulation enhances spatial change detection compared to auditory-only processing, and whether older adults benefit more from multisensory stimulation than younger adults. Methods: In an active oddball task, younger and older participants had to detect spatial changes in azimuth (in the horizontal plane) or distance (in the depth dimension). Stimuli were presented as auditory-only or audio-visual (spatially congruent). Behavioral performance and event-related potentials indexing sensory processing (P1, N1, P2), automatic change detection (mismatch negativity), attention orienting (P3a), and evaluation (P3b) were measured. Results: Detection accuracy was higher for azimuth than distance changes in auditory-only conditions, but this difference was reduced with audio-visual stimulation. Older adults showed comparable behavioral performance to younger adults across both conditions, with no additional benefit from multisensory input. However, older adults exhibited enhanced early sensory processing (larger N1, P2 amplitudes), reduced MMN differentiation between azimuth and distance deviations, and later evaluative processing that was primarily modulated by spatial dimension and stimulation modality. Thus, age-related neural differences were component-specific and depended on spatial dimension and stimulation modality. Discussion: Taken together, audio-visual integration facilitated spatial change detection, particularly in the depth dimension. While older adults maintained behavioral performance possibly through compensatory neural mechanisms involving enhanced attentional allocation, the use of multisensory stimuli for spatial change detection appears to be largely preserved in aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.