Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42643232›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Region-specific weighting of sensory intensity and reward prediction error by dopamine signals.

Sarah-Julie Bouchard, Joël Boutin, Martin Lévesque, Vincent Breton-Provencher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah-Julie BouchardCERVO Brain Research Centre, Québec City, QC G1J 2G3, Canada.
Joël BoutinCERVO Brain Research Centre, Québec City, QC G1J 2G3, Canada.
Martin LévesqueCERVO Brain Research Centre, Québec City, QC G1J 2G3, Canada.
Vincent Breton-ProvencherCERVO Brain Research Centre, Québec City, QC G1J 2G3, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing evidence shows that dopamine signaling is diverse, with dopaminergic neurons responding to rewarding and aversive stimuli. Here, we hypothesized that this heterogeneity arises from a distributed balance between two components of dopamine signaling: sensory intensity of a stimulus, and reward prediction error. To test this, we simultaneously recorded dopamine release across striatal and cortico-amygdalar circuits using multi-site fiber photometry and a fluorescent dopamine sensor during a classical conditioning paradigm. Using a regression model, we found that striatal areas such as the dorsal striatum and nucleus accumbens emphasized reward prediction error, whereas the medial prefrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala favored sensory intensity. Noise correlation analyses further supported these findings by revealing two modules of coordinated dopamine activity: one linking striatal regions and another linking cortical-amygdalar circuits. Together, our results suggest that dopamine balances sensory and reward information, a mechanism that may support attentional processes alongside its role in associative learning.

Indexed as

amygdalaclassical conditioningdopaminedopamine sensorsnucleus accumbensoptogeneticsprefrontal cortexreward prediction errorstriatum

Identifiers

PMID42643232
PMCPMC13503106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.