ArticleNursing in critical care2026
Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting ICU-Acquired Weakness in Postoperative Patients.
Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) is a common and debilitating complication among critically ill patients, particularly those undergoing major surgery. Early identification of patients at high risk of ICU-AW may facilitate timely preventive strategies and targeted rehabilitation interventions.
aimTo develop and internally validate an interpretable machine learning model for predicting ICU-AW in postoperative patients admitted to the ICU. STUDY
designThis retrospective study collected data from patients who had previously been admitted to the surgical ICU after surgery. ICU-AW was defined as a Medical Research Council sum score ≤ 48. Candidate predictors were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Eight machine learning algorithms were developed and internally validated using a 7:3 random split and 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves and decision curve analysis. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was applied to interpret model predictions.
resultsIn total, 967 postoperative patients admitted to the surgical ICU were included in the analysis. The overall incidence of ICU-AW was 24.4%. Five predictors were selected by LASSO: postoperative delirium, interleukin-6, Barthel index, sepsis and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Among the eight algorithms, the random forest model achieved the best discriminative performance in the validation cohort (AUC 0.788, 95% CI: 0.727-0.849) and demonstrated good calibration and clinical utility. SHAP analysis identified Barthel index, SOFA score and postoperative delirium as the top contributors to the model's predictions and provided individualised explanations of risk estimates.
conclusionsThis study developed an interpretable model using five variables to predict ICU-AW in surgical ICU patients, which demonstrated good performance, predictive value and clinical utility. A user-friendly web-based tool was developed to support individualised risk assessment and enhance clinical applicability. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The proposed model may assist clinicians in early risk stratification of postoperative ICU patients and facilitate targeted surveillance and preventive care for those at high risk of ICU-AW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.