ArticleBMC health services research2026
Quantifying spatial accessibility to inpatient hospices in Germany.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpatial access is an important indicator to assess quality of healthcare services and healthcare situation, with accessibility and availability as central components. Using inpatient hospices as an example of specialist palliative care in Germany, different indicators are used to measure spatial accessibility, which vary in complexity and considered variables. We compare four widely used methods, identify regional differences, and discuss possible differences in the results caused by methodological characteristics.
methodsLocations of inpatient hospices were identified using a freely accessible online self-disclosure database, supplemented by lists from regional associations and own research. Spatial access was examined using provider-to-population ratios based on district level, and network-based travel time of 15, 30 and 60 min as used in literature. Further, Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (2SFCA) and Enhanced Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (E2SFCA) were applied using geocoded locations, hospice bed capacities, population data, and road network data.
results295 inpatient hospices were identified. 211 of 401 districts have at least one hospice, resulting in an availability of 36.4 beds per 1 million inhabitants nationally. 90.3% of the population can reach a hospice by car within 30 min (network-based travel time). The results of the FCA methods show a heterogeneous pattern in spatial accessibility index (SPAI
conclusionsThe results indicate that inpatient hospices in Germany are timely accessible via private transport, if available, though rural areas have lower accessibility. However, the chosen method significantly influences the results. Indicators such as provider-to-population ratios and network-based travel time can provide a basic analysis of the care situation due to their ease of interpretation. This study can raise awareness among decision-makers planning new hospices to consider more advanced methods, such as FCA methods, as these take both dimensions of accessibility equally into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.