Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42642752›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2026

Krenning score enhances integrated biomarker models for survival prediction in PRRT-treated GEP-NET: a retrospective cohort study.

Christian A Dascalescu, Felix L Herr, Ricarda Ebner, Victoria Fusch, Moritz L Schnitzer, Matthias P Fabritius, Christine Schmid-Tannwald, Mathias J Zacherl, Vera Wenter, Matthias Brendel and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Christian A DascalescuDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Christian.Dascalescu@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6680-1545
Felix L HerrDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Ricarda EbnerDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Victoria FuschDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Moritz L SchnitzerDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Matthias P FabritiusDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Christine Schmid-TannwaldDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Mathias J ZacherlDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Vera WenterDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Matthias BrendelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Adrien HolzgreveDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christoph J AuernhammerDepartment of Medicine IV, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christine SpitzwegDepartment of Medicine IV, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thomas KnöselDepartment of Pathology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tanja BurkardDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Jens RickeDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Johannes RübenthalerDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Maurice M HeimerDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Gabriel T SheikhDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Rudolf A WernerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Konrad Klimek *Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Clemens C Cyran *Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPurpose of this study is to evaluate the value of a routinely available baseline SSTR-PET imaging parameter, the Krenning score (KS), within integrated biomarker models for overall survival prediction in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP-NET) patients undergoing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 178 patients with GEP-NET who underwent PRRT. At baseline, the KS, clinical, histopathological, and laboratory parameters were integrated and correlated with OS. OS predictors were identified using univariate Cox regression analysis and incorporated into multivariate models. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC).

resultsIn univariate analysis, the following parameters were significantly associated with shorter OS: KS 3 vs. KS 4 (p = 0.042), CgA > 155 ng/mL (p = 0.003), NSE > 35 ng/mL (p = 0.042), BMI < 18.5 kg/m² (p = 0.017), CRP > 0.5 mg/dL (p = 0.045), albumin < 4.1 g/dL (p = 0.017), and Hb < 12 g/dL (p = 0.017). The multivariate Cox regression model including KS, hemoglobin, and NSE showed the lowest AIC (C-index = 0.64, CI: 0.57-0.71; AIC = 527.60), while the model incorporating BMI, hemoglobin, and CgA demonstrated the highest C-index (C-index = 0.66, CI: 0.60-0.72; AIC = 582.82).

conclusionIntegrated baseline biomarker models combining clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters may support overall survival risk stratification in GEP-NET patients undergoing PRRT. Incorporation of the routinely available Krenning score contributed to one of the best-performing parsimonious exploratory multivariable models, suggesting that accessible molecular imaging parameters may complement established baseline biomarkers. These exploratory findings require validation in larger, preferably multicenter, independent cohorts before clinical implementation. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorIntestinal NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOctreotidePositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, SomatostatinBiomarkers, TumorOctreotideRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, SomatostatinGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumorIntegrated diagnosticsKrenning scoreOverall survivalPeptide receptor radionuclide therapy

Identifiers

PMID42642752
PMCPMC13505048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.