ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2026
Cognitive strategies in the Emergency Medical Services: proposal for a conceptual integrated framework to explicate clinical reasoning in EMS.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical reasoning is fundamental to safe and effective Emergency Medical Services (EMS) care. EMS providers operate in dynamic, time-pressured environments characterised by diagnostic uncertainty, limited information, and high-stakes decisions. These conditions necessitate rapid yet adaptable reasoning strategies.The SPART model was developed through focused ethnography and content validation to describe observable diagnostic and therapeutic activities in EMS practice. It provides a structured representation of the care process from dispatch to transfer of care, serving as a basis for the clinical reasoning (CR) process executed by EMS providers. While it clarifies what EMS providers do, it does not explicate the cognitive processes underpinning these activities.The Dual-Process Theory (DPT) has been widely adopted to explain clinical reasoning, distinguishing between intuitive (System 1) and analytic (System 2) processes. In addition to the two systems defined in the DPT, a third, supervisory metacognitive (System 3), was proposed. To our knowledge, the DPT and the System 3 concept have not yet been explicitly integrated with EMS-specific workflow models. As a result, cognitive explanations and process descriptions of CR in EMS remain conceptually disconnected.
aimTo present a theory-based integrated framework that explicates clinical reasoning in EMS by integrating the SPART model, Dual-Process Theory, with a supervisory metacognitive system.
methodA conceptual synthesis grounded in cognitive psychology and the diagnostic reasoning literature, explicitly mapped onto the empirically derived SPART workflow, was conducted.
resultsThe conceptual integrated framework views EMS clinical reasoning as an ongoing interaction between intuitive and analytical processes, overseen by a metacognitive supervisory system, and situated within the SPART phases of EMS care. The model explains adaptive decision-making, bias mitigation, and complex disposition decisions such as non-conveyance.
conclusionThis paper addresses the gap between the theory and practice of EMS clinical reasoning by introducing a cognitive framework explicitly aligned with SPART, integrating Dual-Process Theory (DPT) and a supervisory metacognitive system, thereby enabling a combined understanding of workflow and cognition in EMS practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.