Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42642686›Full record

SynthesisPsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Back in time: Reversed speech as a window into cognitive language processing-A systematic review.

Mathias Scharinger

Abstract readSystematic ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mathias ScharingerResearch Group Phonetics, Institute of German Linguistics, Philipps-University Marburg, Pilgrimstein 16, 35032, Marburg, Germany. mathias.scharinger@uni-marburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1279-1423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The speech signal unfolds in time. This has repercussions for speech production and processing. For production, processing units are assembled in a language-specific order, while in perception, the acoustic signal is segmented into specific, temporally ordered processing units. Specific insights into the forward processing of speech and its assumed mechanisms can be gained from reversed speech. Reversed speech can be either the production of speech in reverse order by skilled speakers (subjectively reversed speech), or speech played back in reverse order for investigating the mechanisms underlying speech segmentation and perception (objectively reversed speech). Direct research on reversed speech has hitherto been very sparse, leaving out opportunities to further the understanding of underlying segmentation and perception mechanisms together with temporal constraints on forward processing. To this end, a systematic literature review on reversed speech is presented here. Three insights can be gained from this review. First, findings from subjectively and objectively reversed speech can be integrated in coupled oscillator models, capitalizing on neural oscillations that align with individual speech sounds, syllable and phrases. Second, the temporal order of information in time windows < 40 ms is relatively irrelevant for perception, while the relative order of processing units is important for both perception and production. Third, objectively reversed speech is predominantly used as a control condition in speech processing studies but should be more carefully implemented, depending on the exact research questions. In general, cross-frequency coupling can be considered a domain-general neural mechanism underlying cognitive flexibility of which reversed speech is a prime candidate.

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech PerceptionHumansBackward talkingChunkingPhonological awarenessProcessing unitsReversed speechSegmentationWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID42642686
PMCPMC13506624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.