ArticleBritish journal of cancer2026
The role of DNA mismatch repair status in oesophagogastric cancer treated with perioperative chemotherapy: evidence from the MRC ST03 and OE05 trials.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMismatch repair deficiency (MMRd) is a key determinant of tumour biology, however, its prognostic significance in patients with resectable oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative cytotoxic chemotherapy remains uncertain.
methodsMMR status was assessed in 1424 patients with oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma enroled in the MRC OE05 and ST03 trials, which investigated perioperative chemotherapy regimens. Associations between MMR status, clinicopathological variables, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and post-progression survival (PPS) were investigated.
resultsIn total, 78 (5.5%) tumours were MMRd, 80.8% due to MLH1 loss. Patients with MMRd tumours had improved OS compared with patients with MMR proficient (MMRp) tumours (median unreached vs 28.0 months; p = 0.0009; 5-year rates 50.1% vs. 34.3%), and PFS (median 56.7 vs 21.4 months; p = 0.0032). On multivariable analysis, MMRd remained associated with improved OS (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.87; p = 0.007) and PFS (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.45-0.90; p = 0.011). PPS did not differ by MMR status. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to suggest that perioperative cytotoxic chemotherapy does not abrogate the favourable prognostic impact of MMRd prior to disease progression. However, MMR status did not influence survival after progression. Our results challenge clinical concerns that cytotoxic chemotherapy may be detrimental in patients with resectable MMRd oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma.
Identifiers
42642646What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.