Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42642622›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2026

Deployable high-fidelity metagenome binning at scale with QuickBin.

Brian Bushnell, Juan C Villada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian BushnellDOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. bbushnell@lbl.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-8140-0131
Juan C VilladaDOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. jvillada@lbl.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-2216-4279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstructing genomes from metagenomic assemblies is foundational to microbiome research, yet binning faces a persistent trade-off between fidelity and throughput. Many high-accuracy methods rely on GPU-intensive workflows, marker-gene postprocessing, or heavy computational resources, limiting reproducible use at scale. Here, we present QuickBin, a CPU-native, marker-free binning algorithm designed to recover near-complete, ultra-low-contamination metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) efficiently. QuickBin pairs a GC-coverage spatial index (BinMap) with an early-exit Oracle cascade of similarity tests (scalar composition/coverage filters and SIMD-accelerated k-mer comparisons), reserving a compact neural network exclusively for ambiguous merges. Across synthetic communities, evaluated by marker-based and contig-origin ground truth, QuickBin maximizes high-fidelity sequence recovery. In benchmarking 297 diverse real metagenomes, QuickBin completed all runs, recovering more high-quality MAGs (≥95% completeness, ≤1% contamination) than resource-intensive alternatives that frequently failed. QuickBin provides a practical path to reproducible, genome-resolved metagenomics at scale for downstream comparative analyses. Open-source at: https://github.com/bbushnell/BBTools .

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMetagenomeMetagenomicsSoftwareMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID42642622
PMCPMC13507350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.