Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42642601›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Dissecting Epigenetic Drug Response Mechanisms Using CRISPR Knockout Screens.

Xinyue Zhou, Rui Lu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xinyue ZhouDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Rui LuDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. ruilu1@uabmc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic drugs are widely applied in cancer therapy due to their ability to modify gene expression without altering the DNA sequence. Despite their therapeutic potential, drug resistance frequently occurs, posing a significant challenge in cancer treatment. CRISPR screens have emerged as a powerful tool to address this issue by leveraging the precision of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to enable the systematic interrogation of genes. This approach involves the simultaneous targeting of thousands of genes to elucidate their roles in various biological processes, disease mechanisms, and drug responses, providing valuable insights into gene function and potential therapeutic targets. In cancer therapy, CRISPR screens provide a deeper understanding of cancer progression by enabling the identification of essential genes and facilitating the discovery of novel therapeutic targets when combined with epigenetic drugs. Here, we present an overview of the CRISPR screen methodology, which involves introducing guide RNAs targeting specific genes into cells, followed by phenotype selection and analysis.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCRISPR-Cas SystemsEpigenesis, GeneticGene Knockout TechniquesNeoplasmsAnimalsEpigenome EditingGene EditingHumansRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsAntineoplastic AgentsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPR-Cas9Epigenetic drug responseLibrary designLibrary QCPhenotype selectionPooled screensgRNA

Identifiers

PMID42642601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.