ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026
Comparing In Vivo and In Vitro Pollen Tube Attraction Assays for Arabidopsis and Maize.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pollen tube attraction is a crucial step in the reproduction of angiosperms, ensuring that the male gametophytes, which carry two sperm cells, accurately target the compatible female gametophytes, or embryo sacs, in order to achieve double fertilization. Various experimental systems have been developed to study this process in vivo and in vitro, particularly in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis). However, fewer methods have been described for other plant species, including grasses, which generate much thicker reproductive tissues and organs. Here, we present and compare optimized protocols for tracing individual pollen tubes in Arabidopsis, which are required, for example, for studies in which wild-type and mutant pollen tubes exhibit different growth speeds, as well as for studying maize pollen tube growth and for characterizing potential attraction molecules. Together, these protocols contribute to the necessary tools to investigate the conserved and divergent mechanisms of pollen tube attraction in both eudicot and monocot species, offering valuable insights into reproductive signaling pathways that are relevant to both basic biology and applied breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42642581What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.