ArticleJournal of plant research2026
Herbarium specimens in the age of artificial intelligence: from herbarium image identification to Integrative Taxonomic AI.
Article in Journal of plant research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Herbarium specimens are physical, verifiable records that form the basis of taxonomic knowledge and biodiversity research. Their large-scale digitization has produced extensive collections of high-resolution images and associated specimen metadata, creating conditions in which artificial intelligence (AI) can play an important role in plant taxonomy, collection management, and ecological research. Early AI applications have primarily focused on automated species identification based on individual specimen images. Although increasingly accurate, such approaches remain limited by their emphasis on single-specimen label prediction and by treating identification outputs as final analytical decisions. Recent methodological advances-including segmentation-based preprocessing, automated trait extraction, structured extraction of label data, detection of potentially misidentified specimens, and multimodal integration of visual, textual, and genetic information-extend AI applications beyond species identification toward broader analytical frameworks, encompassing taxonomic interpretation as well as ecological and biodiversity research. In these approaches, specimens are placed within a shared analytical space, and identification results are used to support comparisons across multiple specimens rather than being treated as final decisions for single individuals. This multi-specimen perspective enables quantitative examination of species boundaries, morphological variation, data inconsistencies, and taxonomic stability within curated collections. In this context, AI serves not as an ultimate decision-maker but as a decision-support tool embedded in expert-guided workflows and biodiversity knowledge infrastructures. These developments can be summarized as Integrative Taxonomic AI, an approach that employs learned morphospaces to interpret and refine taxonomic categories by integrating multimodal evidence and curated specimen data under expert guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42642551What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.