ArticleScientific reports2026
An automated derivative-based method for detection of motor evoked potential onset latencies in multi-muscle transcranial magnetic stimulation studies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor evoked potential (MEP) onset latency is a useful neurophysiological measure, but manual measurement is time-consuming in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies with large numbers of trials. This is particularly relevant in cortical mapping studies recording from multiple muscles simultaneously, where automated methods could support more scalable analyses. Existing onset-detection methods have shown promise in more restricted datasets, but their performance in heterogeneous multi-muscle mapping data remains uncertain. In this pilot validation study, three healthy adults underwent TMS cortical mapping with simultaneous EMG recording from eight upper-limb muscles during resting and active conditions, yielding 3,840 EMG epochs. Three independent raters classified MEP presence and marked onset latency for all trials. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Fleiss' κ for detection and ICC(2,1) for latency. Human majority vote for MEP presence and mean latency ratings were used as the reference standard to benchmark a novel derivative-ratio algorithm against an existing method. Human raters showed moderate to strong agreement for MEP detection (Fleiss' κ = 0.69) and high reliability for latency ratings (ICC(2,1) = 0.95), with a pooled mean absolute pairwise difference of 0.88 ms. The derivative-ratio algorithm showed strong detection performance and human-like latency estimates, outperforming a previously published algorithm. These pilot validation data suggest that the derivative-ratio method provides promising automatic MEP onset latency detection in complex multi-muscle cortical mapping data and may provide a basis for scalable latency analysis. By enabling reproducible extraction of conduction-related MEP features, this approach may support future biomarker studies in neurological disorders characterised by altered corticospinal excitability or corticospinal conduction, pending further validation in larger and clinically diverse datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.