ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Development and Validation of Nomograms for Predicting Overall Survival and Recurrence After Upfront Pancreatic Resection for Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Institution Analysis of 2958 Patients.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReliable prediction of overall survival and recurrence after resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a critical unmet need. MATERIALS AND
methodsDual nomograms for overall survival (OS) and recurrence were constructed using backward stepwise selection, validated with bootstrap resampling (500 iterations) and a 7:3 training-validation split. Risk stratification was performed using X-tile-optimized cutpoints.
resultsThe median OS was 22.4 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 18.0%. The OS nomogram (10 predictors) achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.780 in the validation set. The recurrence nomogram (8 predictors) achieved an AUC of 0.732 in the validation set. Both models demonstrated excellent calibration and clinical utility. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and adjuvant chemotherapy were the strongest predictors for both endpoints. Peripancreatic fat infiltration was a particularly strong driver of recurrence (OR 2.19). Risk stratification classified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with significantly different outcomes (P < 0.001).
conclusionsThe proposed dual nomograms provide individualized prediction of OS and recurrence risk with robust discrimination and calibration. These tools may assist clinicians in risk stratification and postoperative surveillance planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42642536What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.