Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42642466›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026

Empirical evidence for gut microbial influence on human brain neurochemistry via the gut-brain axis.

Nicola Johnstone, Kathrin Cohen Kadosh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicola JohnstoneSchool of Psychology, University of Roehampton, London, SW15 4JD, UK. nicola.johnstone@roehampton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-1525
Kathrin Cohen KadoshSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK. k.cohenkadosh@surrey.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9999-7485

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome produces metabolites with potential neuroactive properties, many of which act locally within the gut. While preclinical studies suggest these microbial pathways can influence cognitive and emotional processes, human evidence remains limited. This study investigates associations between gut microbiome-derived neuroactive functional potential and in vivo brain neurotransmitter concentrations in healthy young females. Using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (¹H-MRS), we quantified GABA and glutamate levels in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and inferior occipital gyrus (IOG). Parallel metagenomic profiling characterised microbial functional potential for pathways related to the synthesis and degradation of GABA, glutamate, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), p-cresol, and inositol. Region-specific associations were observed between these microbial pathways and cortical GABA and glutamate levels, including excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) balance, a key marker of neuroplasticity and mental health. Notably, microbial glutamate degradation and inositol synthesis potential were associated with IOG E/I balance, while additional pathways including GABA metabolism, p-cresol production, and SCFA synthesis showed distinct associations across regions. Exploratory analyses also identified links between microbial functional potential and anxiety, depressive symptoms, and sleep quality. Together, these findings provide new human evidence that variation in microbial functional potential corresponds with regional cortical neurochemistry and psychological wellbeing, highlighting the gut-brain axis as a promising avenue for mechanistically informed microbiome-based- interventions.

Identifiers

PMID42642466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.