Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42642457›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Experimental and numerical investigation of rubberized concrete beam-column joints subjected to monotonic loading.

Wafaa A Salman, Ehab M Lotfy, Ahmed M Gomaa, Abdel-Rahman M Naguib, Sally Hosny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wafaa A SalmanCivil Engineering Program, High Institute of Engineering and Technology, Arish, Egypt.
Ehab M LotfyDepartment of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Ahmed M GomaaConstruction and Building Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Egyptian Chinese University, Cairo, Egypt. Ahmed.MahmoudAbdEl-Khalek@ecu.edu.eg.
Abdel-Rahman M NaguibDepartment of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Sally HosnyDepartment of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incorporation of waste tire rubber into structural concrete has attracted increasing attention as a sustainable approach for reducing environmental pollution while enhancing the deformation capacity and energy absorption of reinforced concrete (RC) members. However, the structural behavior of rubberized concrete beam-column joints remains insufficiently understood, particularly under monotonic loading conditions. This study presents an integrated experimental and numerical investigation of exterior RC beam-column joints incorporating crumb rubber as a partial replacement for fine aggregate. Four exterior beam-column joint specimens containing 0%, 10%, 15%, and 20% crumb rubber by volume were tested under monotonic lateral loading while maintaining a constant axial load on the column. The structural response was evaluated in terms of load-displacement behavior, ultimate load capacity, stiffness degradation, deformation capacity, energy absorption, crack development, and failure mode. A three-dimensional finite element model was developed using ABAQUS based on the Concrete Damage Plasticity (CDP) model and validated against the experimental results. The validated numerical model was subsequently employed to conduct a parametric study investigating the influence of axial load ratio on the structural performance of rubberized beam-column joints. The experimental results demonstrated that incorporating moderate amounts of crumb rubber significantly enhanced deformation capacity and energy absorption while maintaining satisfactory load-carrying capacity. The specimen containing 10% crumb rubber exhibited the best overall structural performance by providing the most balanced combination of strength, deformation capacity, and energy absorption, with only a limited reduction in ultimate strength compared with the control specimen. Numerical predictions showed excellent agreement with the experimental observations in terms of load-displacement response, cracking behavior, and failure mode. The parametric study further indicated that lower-to-moderate axial load ratios provided favorable structural performance, whereas excessive axial compression reduced the deformation capacity of the joints. The findings demonstrate that rubberized concrete can provide a practical and sustainable alternative for improving the overall structural performance of RC beam-column joints subjected to monotonic loading.

Indexed as

Beam–column jointsFinite element analysisMonotonic loadingRubberized concreteSustainable structures

Identifiers

PMID42642457
PMCPMC13507177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.