ArticleScientific reports2026
Pore-scale modelling of methane-driven helium extraction in deep tight sandstones.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Helium is a strategic resource for cryogenic, aerospace, semiconductor, and other advanced technologies, but in deep tight sandstone reservoirs it may occur partly as dissolved helium in formation water, and its transfer into a producible gas phase remains poorly quantified. Here we examine methane-driven helium extraction under representative deep tight-reservoir conditions by coupling sub-voxel pore reconstruction, gas-water partitioning calculations, and pore-scale transport simulations. The analysis uses geological boundary constraints from the Ordos Basin, weakly supervised convolutional neural-network reconstruction of sub-voxel porosity, thermodynamic gas-water partitioning calculations, and lattice Boltzmann pore-scale transport simulations. The reconstructed digital rock better preserves micro-nano pore connectivity than simple binary segmentation and is used to estimate Knudsen/slip-controlled transport contrasts between helium and methane. The simulations indicate that helium can maintain a slightly higher apparent permeability than methane in nano-confined pore throats because of its smaller molecular diameter. This relative mobility advantage increases at low pressure but becomes small under the representative deep-reservoir pressure used in this study. Thermodynamic calculations indicate that high temperature, high pressure, and high salinity favour helium partitioning from the aqueous phase into the gas phase, whereas methane flow increases interfacial contact and convective stripping. Multi-slice extraction simulations further suggest that helium release is concentrated near gas-water contact zones and is later limited by diffusion-driven replenishment from adjacent water-bearing pore regions. The results support an analogue pore-scale interpretation of methane-assisted helium mobilization in a tight-sandstone pore network, but their reservoir-scale generality remains limited by the use of an analogue digital-rock dataset and slice-based pore-scale simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.