ArticleScientific reports2026
Explainable hybrid multi-branch CNN-ViT-GNN framework for robust hibiscus leaf disease classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and reliable diagnosis of hibiscus leaf diseases is critical to protect horticultural yield. Yet, it remains challenging under real-time field conditions where uncontrolled lighting, clutter, and the non-contiguous nature of pathological symptoms blur diagnostic cues. To address these challenges, we introduce CNN-FusionViT-GNN. This explainable hybrid multi-branch framework synergizes the fine-grained texture extraction of a DenseNet201 backbone, the global contextual modeling of a Vision Transformer (ViT), and the relational reasoning of a Graph Neural Network (GNN). The model is trained and validated on 'Hibiscus,' a curated field dataset of 1165 images from Bangladesh, which is strategically augmented to 8000 samples for robust training following a strict train-validation-test split. The proposed framework achieves a state-of-the-art accuracy of 98.33% with a macro F1-score of 0.98. The framework's generalization is confirmed through high performance on external datasets: 98.78% accuracy on the 52-class Plant City dataset and 83.88% on the 10-class Tomato Leaf Disease dataset, while maintaining a rapid inference time of 10-45 ms. Furthermore, a multi-faceted Explainable AI (XAI) audit using LIME, Grad-CAM++, ViT Attention Maps, and Occlusion Sensitivity validates that the model's decisions are driven by biologically meaningful symptom patterns rather than background artifacts. This study establishes a computationally efficient, transparent, and robust pathway for automated disease diagnosis in precision agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.