ArticleNature communications2026
Navigating optimal solar-wind trade-offs under climate change.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimal solar-wind ratio (SWR) plays a critical role in shaping the cost and reliability of renewable electricity systems, yet its adaptability under climate change remains poorly understood. Here, we develop a climate-driven SWR optimization framework that couples multi-model climate projections with an integrated investment and dispatch model to quantify how future climate variability reshapes cost-optimal solar-wind configurations. We find that optimal SWRs exhibit pronounced latitudinal differences and show modest changes under climate change. Deployment pathways inherited from the historical preference scenario may diverge from optimal SWRs, leading to increases in system costs and capacity requirements. In many regions, these SWR mismatches amplify electricity supply costs far more than the cost impacts associated with climate-induced changes in renewable resources alone. Cost escalation is driven mainly by SWR mismatch rather than solely by climate-induced resource changes. These findings highlight the importance of climate-responsive and region-specific SWR optimization as a key element of resilient and economically efficient power system planning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.