Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42642411›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

The Nigella damascena genome provides insights into transposable element-driven genomic gigantism and trait evolution.

Xuehao Fu, Tianyu Lei, Boka Li, Chunxi Peng, Cheng Xue, Ruoheng Jian, Yi Yuan, Xu Yao, Yuannian Jiao, Guixia Xu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Xuehao Fu *State Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0475-0322
Tianyu Lei *State Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Boka Li *State Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chunxi PengState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Cheng XueState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ruoheng JianState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yi YuanState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xu YaoState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9661-1003
Yuannian JiaoState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8987-2782
Guixia XuState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1510-5505
Rui ZhangCollege of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Jie ChengState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7065-2747
Xiaofeng YinState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6892-761X
Hongyan ShanState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. shanhongyan@ibcas.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6662-2935
Hongzhi KongState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. hzkong@ibcas.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0034-0510

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32200185National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32221001National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32370231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant genomes, generally dominated by transposable elements (TEs), have evolved repeatedly in angiosperms. The role of TEs in the evolution of giant genomes, however, remains largely unclear. Here, by ancestral genome size reconstruction, whole-genome sequencing, and comparative genomic and transcriptomic analyses, we reveal the processes, drivers, and consequences of genomic gigantism in the buttercup family (Ranunculaceae). We find that the giant diploid genome of Nigella damascena (10.84 Gb, ~35 times that of columbine) has evolved from an ~1.46 Gb ancestral genome by persistent TE accumulation over 60 million years. TE insertions in genic regions have generated genes with ultra-long introns or altered coding sequences, as well as Nigella-specific TE-derived genes, collectively accounting for ~20% of protein-coding genes in the N. damascena genome. TE-mediated regulatory changes and gene duplications/losses likely underpin the evolution of elaborate petals, fused carpels, and specialized secondary metabolites in N. damascena. These findings reveal how TEs drive genomic gigantism and shape specialized traits, advancing our understanding of genome size evolution.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularGenome, PlantGenome SizeGenomicsPhylogenyDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID42642411
PMCPMC13507195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.