ArticleNature communications2026
Entanglement-enhanced learning of quantum processes at scale.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the fundamental resource for exponential advantage in quantum channel learning.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Benchmarking Quantum Gates and Circuits.Chemical reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Learning unknown noise processes in quantum systems reveals their physical origin and informs error suppression, mitigation, and correction. Characterizing a general quantum process requires exponentially many parameters inferred from noncommuting measurements. Because these measurements cannot be performed simultaneously, the sample complexity grows exponentially. For Pauli channels, quantum memory and entangling operations can transform this task into measurements of commuting observables, reducing complexity exponentially. However, noise in these resources increases the overhead, leaving open whether any advantage remains in realistic devices. Here, we introduce error-mitigated entanglement-enhanced learning, analyze it theoretically, and demonstrate it experimentally. We quantify the noise-induced overhead, perform hypothesis testing with up to 64 qubits, and learn intrinsic noise in parallel-gate layers using up to 16 qubits of a superconducting processor. We show that noisy quantum memory provides a learning advantage, with a current experimental overhead of 1.33 ± 0.05 per qubit, below the no-entanglement lower bound of 2.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.