Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42642353›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2026

Factors Associated With Victorian Adolescents' Harm Perceptions and Attitudes About e-Cigarettes.

Ian Koh, Maree Scully, Emily Baker, Melanie Wakefield, Victoria White, Sarah Durkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Factors Associated With Victorian Adolescents' Harm Perceptions and Attitudes About e-Cigarettes.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ian KohCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8633-2723
Maree ScullyCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5342-5326
Emily BakerCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9227-2243
Melanie WakefieldCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6183-5699
Victoria WhiteSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6619-8484
Sarah DurkinCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2795-6454

Funding

Australian Government Department of Health, Disability and AgeingCancer Council VictoriaVictorian Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedTo explore Australian adolescents' perceptions of the risks and health harms associated with vaping and their attitudes towards e-cigarettes and examine if these vary by demographic and other factors.

methodsData were from a 2022-2023 cross-sectional, school-based survey of Victorian students aged 12-17 years (n = 1701 [weighted]; n = 1696 [unweighted]). Separate multivariable logistic regression models tested associations between agreement with each perception/attitude and predictors (age group, gender, area-based socio-economic status, vaping susceptibility, e-cigarette marketing exposure, peer vaping), controlling for education sector and school-level clustering.

resultsMost students (≥ 86%) agreed that vaping is harmful and addictive and that e-cigarettes contain harmful substances and nicotine, while agreement that breathing other people's e-cigarette vapour can affect your health was somewhat lower (69%). Perceptions of vaping harms tended to be stronger among females (vs. males) and weaker among past-month vapers (vs. non-susceptible, never-vapers). Overall, students held more negative than favourable attitudes towards e-cigarettes. However, vaping susceptibility, being of younger age and having a close friend that vapes were independently associated with having more favourable attitudes towards e-cigarettes (e.g., they look cool, make vaping look exciting). Further, past-month exposure to e-cigarette advertising was associated with students believing that e-cigarettes look good, make vaping look appealing, encourage them to vape and encourage them to buy an e-cigarette.

conclusionsFindings provide support for recent government policies to limit e-cigarette advertising and retail access, and the delivery of youth-targeted educational campaigns about vaping. SO WHAT?: Ongoing monitoring is important to assess sustained change over time in e-cigarette knowledge and attitudes among Australian adolescents, with this study providing an important pre-reform baseline against which such changes can be evaluated.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeStudentsVapingAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesVictoriaadolescentsattitudesAustraliae‐cigarettesperceptionsvaping

Identifiers

PMID42642353
PMCPMC13506352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.