Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42642336›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of medical education2026

Digital technology use experience and acceptance perceptions as predictors of metaverse attitudes among health professions students in Korea.

Jin Young Lee, Kwi Hwa Park, So Jung Yune

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jin Young LeeDepartment of Medical Education, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Kwi Hwa ParkDepartment of Medical Education, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea. ghpark@gachon.ac.kr.
So Jung YuneDepartment of Medical Education, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea. cc139@pusan.ac.kr.

Funding

Ministry of EducationNational Research Foundation of Korea 2023S1A5A2A03084669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study examined differences in digital technology use experience and acceptance perceptions and metaverse attitudes according to major and sex among health professions students. It also determined whether digital technology use experience and acceptance perceptions predicted metaverse attitudes.

methodsAn online survey was administered to 1,329 Korean medical, nursing, and dental students. Metaverse attitudes comprised perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEU), and user attitude (UA). Group differences were examined using Welch's tests, and hierarchical multiple regression identified predictors of PU, PEU, and UA.

resultsNursing students had significantly higher PU and PEU than medical and dental students, whereas dental students had higher UA, indicating stronger negative attitudes and concerns, than the other groups. Digital technology use experience and acceptance perceptions were the strongest positive predictor of PU (β=0.441) and PEU (β=0.447) and negatively predicted UA (β=-0.116).

conclusionDigital technology use experience and positive acceptance perceptions were closely associated with favorable metaverse attitudes. Metaverse-based educational approaches should be tailored to students' disciplinary backgrounds and digital technology- related characteristics.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to ComputersDigital TechnologyStudents, DentalStudents, Health OccupationsStudents, MedicalStudents, NursingAdultDigital HealthFemaleHumansMalePerceptionRepublic of KoreaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAttitudeHealth occupations studentsMedical educationTechnologyVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42642336
PMCPMC13549804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.