ArticleDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2026
Comparative evaluation of physicochemical, mechanical, and biological properties of biodegradable poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and commercial aligner materials.
Article in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate bio-based, biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) as a sustainable material for clear aligners by comparing its physicochemical, mechanical, and biological properties with commercial aligner materials (Essix Ace, Essix C+, Zendura FLX, and Zendura).
methodsPLA and commercial materials, both neat and aged in artificial saliva for up to 14 days, were examined as sheets. Thermal properties were measured using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Mechanical and optical properties were evaluated using a universal testing machine (UTM) and UV-visible spectrophotometry. Degradation behavior was assessed via weight and average molar mass changes, and surface morphology via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Cytotoxicity was tested using human gingival fibroblasts with an MTT assay.
resultsPLA showed a glass transition temperature of 55.4 °C, melting temperature of 152.1°C, and degradation onset temperature of 362.9 °C, comparable to commercial aligner materials. Its tensile strength and yield stress were similar to those of commercial materials, indicating adequate strength. However, PLA exhibited lower elongation at break and higher Young's modulus, reflecting higher brittleness and stiffness. Aging caused negligible water absorption, minimal weight loss, and minor thermal property change. Mechanical properties remained stable upon aging. Aged PLA was transparent when wet but became hazy when dry, which occurs reversibly. Extracts from PLA were non-cytotoxic, maintaining 90% cell viability in average. SIGNIFICANCE: PLA demonstrated properties comparable to commercial aligner materials, with the exception of increased stiffness and brittleness. Its stability during aging and favorable biocompatibility supports its potential as a sustainable alternative for clear aligner applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.