ReviewZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026
[Emerging role of brain-computer interface in orthopedic rehabilitation and motor function restoration].
Review in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To review the research progress and application prospects of brain-computer interface (BCI) in orthopedic rehabilitation and motor function restoration. Methods: Through literature analysis, the neurophysiological mechanisms of BCI in improving central motor drive deficits, technical paradigms, and clinical evidence in quadriceps inhibition after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and other orthopedic conditions were summarized, and the challenges in clinical translation were discussed. Results: BCI decodes movement-related neural signals and establishes closed-loop feedback between central and peripheral systems, which can enhance corticospinal tract excitability, induce neuroplasticity, and alleviate postoperative muscle inhibition and dysfunction caused by insufficient central motor drive. Available evidence indicates that motor imagery-based BCI training can improve quadriceps voluntary activation rate and reduce muscle strength loss after surgery, showing potential intervention value in other orthopedic conditions. Conclusion: BCI holds promise as an important adjunct to conventional orthopedic rehabilitation, particularly for patients with central motor drive deficits. However, its clinical translation still faces challenges including insufficient mechanistic evidence, high patient heterogeneity, and lack of standardized training protocols, which represent key directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.