ReviewZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026
[Research progress and applications of biologically derived materials in scleral reconstruction].
Review in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To review the research progress and clinical applications of biologically derived materials in scleral reconstruction. Methods: A comprehensive review of recent domestic and international literature was conducted to systematically summarize various biologically derived materials, analyzing their therapeutic outcomes and modification strategies in posterior scleral reinforcement (PSR), scleral defect repair, and glaucoma drainage device (GDD) tube coverage. Results: Biologically derived materials show distinct advantages in different scenarios of scleral reconstruction. In PSR, allogeneic sclera, dura mater, and bovine pericardium can enhance mechanical support of the posterior pole and slow axial elongation; emerging materials such as silk fibroin and gelatin methacrylcyl demonstrate potential in promoting collagen deposition and scleral remodeling. In scleral defect repair, sclera, cornea, amniotic membrane, and collagen matrix can facilitate defect closure, vascularization, and stromal integration. In GDD tube coverage, sclera, cornea, pericardium, and amniotic membrane-umbilical cord tissue can reduce the risk of tube exposure. Overall, individual materials remain limited by mechanical properties, donor availability, or biological activity. Crosslinking modification and composite reinforcement can significantly improve mechanical support and tissue-inductive capacity, promoting the transition from passive repair to active physiological remodeling. Conclusion: Biologically derived materials hold significant value in scleral reconstruction. The development of intelligent and multifunctional composite materials represents the core direction for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.