ReviewZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026
[Research progress of gelatin composites in promoting peripheral nerve regeneration].
Review in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To review the research status of gelatin (Gel) composite material in promoting peripheral nerve regeneration (PNR), and point out the current shortcomings and future research directions. Methods: Domestic and foreign literature related to Gel composites used in PNR was extensively reviewed, and the material characteristics, mechanism, and experimental effects were systematically analyzed from the structure types of nerve guide conduit (NGC), hydrogel, scaffold, film, and nanofiber bundle. Results: Gel composites can improve the biocompatibility, mechanical properties, slow release, and conductivity of NGC, hydrogel, and scaffolds, promote the survival and proliferation of Schwann cells and adipose-derived stem cells, and facilitate the repair of long-distance peripheral nerve injury. The membrane made of Gel composites can reduce the scar formation at the nerve anastomosis, and the nanofiber bundle can help to restore the direct connection of the nerve stump. However, there are also challenges such as insufficient clinical transformation and determination of the best Gel composite scheme. Conclusion: Gel composites show good application potential in PNR, but the optimal material ratio, clinical transformation scheme, and long-term effectiveness still need further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.