ArticleAnnals of rehabilitation medicine2026
Immediate Effects of Walking Training With Elastic Ankle Support Devices on Walking and Mobility of Ambulatory Individuals With Stroke.
Article in Annals of rehabilitation medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To compare the immediate effects of walking training without or with an ankle support device (ASD) on spatiotemporal gait parameters, mobility, and satisfaction among 20 ambulatory participants with chronic stroke.
methodsThis crossover design required the participants to complete the four 30-minute walking training conditions in a randomized order: without ASD, with ankle-foot orthosis (AFO), with long ankle sling made from 3- to 4-inch elastic bandage, and with elastic ankle support equipment (EASE) developed from elastic bands with buttonholes and plastic rivets, with a 7-day washout period. Gait parameters and Timed Up and Go test (TUG) were measured before and after each training program, and satisfaction with the three ASDs was assessed upon completion.
resultsSpatiotemporal parameters (except walking cadence and symmetry) and TUG after training with a long ankle sling and EASE were significantly better than those following training without ASD and with AFO (p<0.001). Participants satisfied with both elastic ASDs in terms of dimensions, weight, safety, comfort, and effectiveness (p<0.001). The EASE was also satisfied for its ease of application and adjustment. The AFO was durable and easy to use but heavy, uncomfortable, and unsafe. Conclusion: The elastic ASDs were designed to assist ankle movements during the stance and swing phases. Thus, they improved walking and mobility of the participants significantly greater than the training with AFO and without ASD. The findings suggest the use of a long ankle sling and EASE as an alternative ASD to promote mobility of ambulatory individuals with chronic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.