Observational studyBMJ open2026
Effects of the Visual Patient Avatar on vital sign deviations and audible alarm burden in perioperative care: a dual-centre, quasi-experimental pre-post large-scale observational study protocol (NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell and University Hospital Zurich).
Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPerioperative monitoring requires clinicians to integrate multiple physiological data streams while managing interruptions and audible alarms. The Visual Patient Avatar (VPA) is an avatar-based monitor visualisation that integrates vital signs and sensor states into an animated virtual patient. This protocol evaluates whether VPA implementation is associated with objective changes in monitoring and alarm outcomes during routine perioperative care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This investigator-initiated, dual-centre, quasi-experimental pre-post observational study uses routine perioperative monitoring and alarm data from NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell, USA and University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland. It includes approximately 58 000 anaesthesia cases (16 000 and 42 000, respectively); adult and paediatric cases will be analysed separately. Data span pre-implementation, adaptation and post implementation phases; technical deployment intervals are excluded. Each anaesthesia case is one unit of analysis. The primary outcome is the duration of vital-sign deviation per 60 min of valid measurement. Secondary outcomes are a time-based area under the curve metric and audible alarm burden (count, time and reaction time). Multivariable models will adjust for patient, procedure and care-context covariates. Analyses will be performed separately by centre. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Weill Cornell Medicine Institutional Review Board approved the study and granted a waiver of informed consent (IRB No. 22-05024803). At University Hospital Zurich, only cases from patients with written general consent for research use of routinely collected health data were included. The Cantonal Ethics Committee Zurich issued a declaration of non-jurisdiction (BASEC Req-2021-00756; 6 July 2021), and the University Hospital Zurich Data Governance Board approved data export and anonymisation (DGR0000504; 31 January 2025). A data-sharing agreement was established on 11 April 2023. Data-collection windows are complete; extraction, linkage and quality control are ongoing, and no comparative outcome analyses have been performed. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.