ArticleChemPlusChem2026
Structure and Catalytic Performance of Aluminum-Based Ozone Catalysts Prepared by a Direct Mixing Method.
Article in ChemPlusChem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ozonation catalysis has attracted considerable attention for the treatment of refractory organic wastewater due to its efficient generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, conventional catalyst preparation methods often suffer from drawbacks such as the production of metal-containing waste effluents. In this study, flash calcined alumina (FCA) was employed as a support to synthesize four ozonation catalysts (γ-Al, Cu-Al, Fe-Al, and Ce-Al) via a direct solid-state mixing method with CuO, Fe
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.