ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2026
Natural language processing to build a computable phenotype library for adults with congenital heart disease.
Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveOur objective was to build classifiers for multiple phenotypes that categorize a cohort of adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD), that can be used to populate variables in a biobank. MATERIALS AND
methodsA dataset of 1492 ACHD patients, with expert-created labels for eight phenotypes, was created and used to train classifiers with three different architectures. A larger unlabeled dataset containing 15,869 patients was used to pre-train the classifiers, and a 20 % subset of the unlabeled dataset was used to validate the classifier predictions.
resultsOn held out labeled data, F1 scores for the eight target phenotypes of interest ranged from 0.66 to 1. Of those, the six phenotypes with best classification performance were then validated on unlabeled data, where positive predictive value ranged from 81.5 % to 100 %. DISCUSSION: We were able to classify six out of eight phenotypes with satisfactory performance. Challenging phenotypes included cyanosis and New York Heart Association functional class. Both vary over time and in the latter case there is limited agreement between human observers. Different phenotypes benefited from different model architectures to some degree, but the differences are small enough that uniformity of deployment may be a more important factor in choosing what models to deploy. We saw no benefit to joint training, but some phenotypes benefited from a multiclass model.
conclusionHuman-curated data can be used to train text-based ACHD phenotype classifiers with promising internal performance acceptable for application in quality improvement efforts and to populate ACHD registry data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.