Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42641011›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2026

Beyond receiving: feedback literacy as a catalyst for resident growth, a scoping review.

Alison Freeth, Sandra Carr

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alison FreethSchool of Allied Health, Health Professions Education, The University of Western, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0009-0005-5959-2455
Sandra CarrSchool of Allied Health, Health Professions Education, The University of Western, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0043-4362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFeedback literacy is gaining momentum in health professions education as an important driver of learning. It involves the capacity to interpret, engage with and act on feedback in ways that promote genuine improvement. While strengthening feedback literacy could make feedback more impactful, it is unclear how effectively resident doctors use these skills in practice.

methodsThis scoping review examines the current landscape of feedback literacy skills among residents through the lens of Carless and Boud's feedback literacy framework of

resultsOf 1048 articles screened, 15 met inclusion criteria and only one was an intervention designed to enhance feedback literacy. Although residents valued feedback, their engagement with it varied widely. Few studies explored how residents judged their own performance, managed emotional responses or acted on feedback. No studies assessed the long-term impact of feedback literacy training on learning or clinical performance.

conclusionFeedback literacy offers a promising pathway to strengthen residents' capacity as purposeful, growth-oriented learners. However, meaningful progress will depend on moving beyond delivering feedback well to explicitly teaching residents how to use it.

Indexed as

FeedbackFormative FeedbackInternship and ResidencyClinical CompetenceHumansLearningfeedbackFeedback literacymedical educationpost graduate medical educationresidents

Identifiers

PMID42641011
PMCPMC13520860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.