Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42640977›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Perceptions of cancer survivors and healthcare professionals on adequate supportive care after treatment of cancer: An in-depth qualitative study.

Doris van der Smissen, Marjolein Lugtenberg, Yosra Abdeselam Rocdi, Laurens V Beerepoot, Floortje Mols, Evelien P M Brouwers, Dareczka K Wasowicz, Margot C W Joosen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Doris van der SmissenTranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2363-9416
Marjolein LugtenbergTranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4117-2154
Yosra Abdeselam RocdiTranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Laurens V BeerepootDepartment of Internal Medicine, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3040-4626
Floortje MolsCenter of Research on Psychological disorders and Somatic diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Evelien P M BrouwersTranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Dareczka K WasowiczDepartment of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Margot C W JoosenTranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFollowing treatment, cancer survivors often struggle to resume their life in several life domains. Although supportive care is increasingly available and can assist survivors in improving their quality of life, it often falls short in meeting the needs of the diverse and growing group of cancer survivors. Understanding the perceptions of key stakeholders is crucial for improving supportive care. This study aims to explore the perceptions of cancer survivors and healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding the provision of adequate supportive care after treatment.

methodsWe conducted 22 interviews with cancer survivors, varying in (time since) diagnosis, sex and age. Additionally, four focus groups were conducted with 25 HCPs, including medical specialists, general practitioners, psychologists, occupational physicians and informal caregivers. Interviews and focus groups were conducted using pre-defined topic guides, were audio-taped, and transcribed verbatim. A thematic content analysis was performed, consisting of several coding phases.

resultsCancer survivors emphasized the importance of a person-centered approach, with supportive care tailored to individual values and needs. They valued accessible supportive care extending beyond medical needs, including work-related support and peer support. HCPs similarly stressed the importance of person-centered supportive care, and promoting cancer survivors' empowerment. They also highlighted limited awareness of supportive care options among HCPs, the need for clear role division, multidisciplinary collaboration, integration into clinical care, and an overview of supportive care referral options.

conclusionWhile both cancer survivors and HCPs emphasized the importance of comprehensive, person-centered supportive care, its implementation in clinical practice remains challenging. Key requirements, such as greater awareness of the importance of supportive care among HCPs, knowledge of reliable referral options, and interdisciplinary collaboration, are often unmet. Efforts should focus on improving HCPs' awareness and integrating supportive care into clinical practice. The findings of this study informed the development of the online tool 'Back on Track with Cancer'. This tool supports the identification of supportive care needs, provides personalized supportive care options, and facilitates shared decision making with HCPs.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsHealth PersonnelNeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID42640977
PMCPMC13505917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.