ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Designing front-of-pack labels for packaged food in low-literacy contexts: Consumer perspectives from India.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Front-of-pack labels (FoPLs) on food products are an evidenced-based, effective strategy to raise consumer awareness of the composition and (un)healthiness of packaged foods and help consumers make informed food choices. We undertook a community-based study, in two regions in India, to understand food purchasing patterns and the essential content and design of an effective and contextually acceptable FoPL, and to gather consumer input on a draft FoPL developed by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India. We conducted 16 focus group discussions with 112 adults, who were regular grocery shoppers for their families. Participants were selected purposively for diversity in gender, educational attainment, socioeconomic status (SES), and site of residence. Data were analysed thematically. Nutrition literacy was revealed to be quite low in most participants, particularly those with low educational attainment, and of low SES. Purchases of packaged foods, including snacks, beverages, and ready-to-eat meal components, were reported to be guided by habit, trust, taste, and others' recommendations. Nutrition information influenced food purchasing decisions mostly for those following diets for various health conditions. Nutrition information on products, although desired, was not always understood correctly. Symbols without supporting text were sometimes interpreted incorrectly. Interpretive FoPLs with clear, readable text, and colours were preferred, and almost all participants wanted FoPLs to be mandatory. A robust nutrition literacy campaign is essential to set the stage for, and accompany the effective implementation of, an FoPL. An ideal FoPL for India would be mandatory, provide nutrition facts, and also interpret them in a summary format for consumers' benefit. Information in languages suitable for the diverse population combined with colours and symbols would enhance the utility of the FoPL.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.