ArticlePloS one2026
Factors associated with influenza vaccine uptake among healthcare workers in Georgia, 2021-2024.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare workers (HCWs) are prioritised to receive influenza vaccine annually in Georgia. We aimed to identify factors associated with influenza vaccine uptake among Georgian HCWs.
methodsWe used self-reported influenza vaccination data for three influenza seasons (2021-2024) and 2023 survey data on attitudes towards influenza from a prospective cohort of HCWs in six hospitals in Georgia. HCWs who received influenza vaccine in at least one season were compared with those who were not vaccinated in any season. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with vaccination uptake.
findingsOf 403 participants, the median age was 46 (IQR 36-54), 364 (90%) were female, 168 (42%) were nurses or midwives, 85 (21%) were support staff, 75 (19%) were doctors, and 75 (19%) were other staff. Overall, 289 (72%) received influenza vaccine in at least one season, while 114 (28%) did not receive it in any season. Multivariable analysis showed no differences in vaccine uptake by sex or occupation. HCWs ≥ 30 years were more likely to be vaccinated, with those aged 40-49 having the highest odds (aOR 2.67, 95% CI 1.09-6.59). HCWs who did not believe the vaccine was safe (aOR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11-0.68), those who doubted its effectiveness (aOR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14-0.89), and HCWs at Hospital B (aOR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.23) were less likely to be vaccinated.
conclusionsGeorgian HCWs who questioned influenza vaccine safety and effectiveness, and those at one hospital, had lower odds of vaccination over three years, whereas older HCWs were more likely to be vaccinated. Future campaigns to promote influenza vaccination among HCWs should address safety and effectiveness concerns and target demographic disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.