ArticlePloS one2026
Obstetric referral practices and health system factors in public health centres of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A mixed-methods study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the rate of obstetric referral and explore contextual factors influencing referral practices in public health centres of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
designExplanatory sequential mixed-methods study. SETTING AND PERIOD: Fifty public health centres in the Addis Ababa City Administration, January-April 2021.
methodsDelivery and referral registers from 50 health centres were reviewed retrospectively for 12 months (8 July 2019-7 June 2020). Facility observations and interviews with maternity unit heads were conducted in all selected centres. In-depth interviews were conducted with 20 midwives and 13 health centre managers. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed thematically using Colaizzi's method.
resultsOnly 13 (26%) of the 50 health centres have met all eight standards assessed for functionality of the referral system. The main gaps of the referral system were a lack of ambulance (12%), absence of formal agreement with referral centers, and lack of timely case-by-case feedback from referral centers(64%). The overall obstetric referral rate was 32%, with substantially higher referral rates in health centers without caesarean section (CS) services compared with those providing CS (39% vs 21%). Qualitative findings indicated that high referral rates were associated with limitations in the predictive capacity of the partograph, variability in providers' clinical skills, and risk-averse practices driven by accountability concerns related to maternal and perinatal outcomes.
conclusionImproving functionality of referrals and reducing unnecessarily high referrals requires adopting and training providers on the new WHO labour guide and partograph, improving referral feedback, and clarifying accountability mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.