ArticleAnnals of medicine2026
Preferences for nutrition education delivery among low-income older adults.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOlder adults with limited financial resources often experience barriers to accessing effective nutrition education, which can contribute to poorer dietary and health outcomes. This study aimed to identify preferred approaches for delivering nutrition education among low-income older adults.
methodsOnline surveys and in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 adults aged 65 years and older with annual incomes below $40,000. Surveys collected sociodemographic information and were administered using Qualtrics, with descriptive analyses conducted in IBM SPSS Statistics. Interviews explored preferences for nutrition education delivery and were analyzed thematically using NVivo to identify recurring patterns and themes.
resultsParticipants strongly preferred in-person nutrition education delivered in familiar, community-based settings. Preferences were driven by accessibility, established routines, and opportunities for relationship building. Social interaction with peers was viewed as an essential component of effective learning and engagement. Hands-on instructional approaches, including food demonstrations and taste tests, were perceived as especially engaging and motivating. In contrast, virtual formats were generally viewed less favorably due to digital literacy challenges, limited technology access, and diminished personal connection. DISCUSSION: This study provides insight into how nutrition education can be more effectively delivered to low-income older adults, particularly those facing economic challenges. Findings suggest that in-person, community-based programming emphasizing social interaction and experiential learning may improve engagement and perceived effectiveness. At the same time, barriers associated with virtual delivery formats highlight important limitations of increasingly technology-driven nutrition education approaches for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.