Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42640884›Full record

ReviewPLoS medicine2026

Estimates of global burden of snakebite: A literature review and geostatistical modelling study.

Dileepa Senajith Ediriweera, Anuradhani Kasturiratne, Arunasalam Pathmeswaran, Ymkje Stienstra, Gerardo Martín, Takuya Iwamura, Kris A Murray, Hithanadura Janaka de Silva, Peter John Diggle, David Griffith Lalloo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dileepa Senajith EdiriweeraCentre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5679-2893
Anuradhani KasturiratneDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5260-2394
Arunasalam PathmeswaranDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4065-2639
Ymkje StienstraCentre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8844-8859
Gerardo MartínDepartamento de Sistemas y Procesos Naurales, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores unidad Mérida, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mérida, Yucatán, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3608-5328
Takuya IwamuraDepartment F.-A. Forel for Aquatic and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3740-7758
Kris A MurrayCentre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, MRC Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8382-0674
Hithanadura Janaka de SilvaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka.
Peter John DiggleCentre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3521-5020
David Griffith LallooCentre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7680-2200

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSnake envenoming (SE) remains an important public health problem, disproportionately affecting impoverished rural communities in tropical and subtropical regions. Although previous attempts have been made to quantify the global burden of SE, accurate, up-to-date data remain scarce. Here we present a comprehensive re-evaluation of the global burden of snakebite, 17 years after our initial estimate. METHODS AND

findingsA new literature review was conducted on snakebites, SE and mortality published in any language, up to March 31, 2025, to update the knowledge accumulated since our first global burden estimate. Based on country- and region-level aggregated data, and hospital and community-based survey data, we modelled SE and mortality burden in relation to geographic location. Explanatory variables were selected to reflect the underlying social and natural environmental conditions. Low and high estimates of the global snakebite burden were calculated using geostatistical models that produced individual-country estimates, accounting for possible underreporting of data when appropriate. We estimate that at least 2.1 million envenomings and 274,000 deaths occur globally each year due to snakebites, and our high estimates suggest up to 7 million envenomings and 513,000 deaths annually. Low-income countries exhibit the highest incidence and mortality rates, with sub-Saharan Africa accounting for 45% of global envenomings and deaths, nearly three times the incidence observed in South Asia. These estimates suggest that previous burden estimates could substantially underestimate the scale of the problem. The main limitations of this study are the scarcity and heterogeneity of empirical data in many countries and the reliance on modelling assumptions to estimate burden in settings with limited or no direct observations.

conclusionsSnake envenoming is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Southeast Asia being the most severely affected regions. Further improvement in the quality of epidemiological data is required for more accurate estimates of the global burden, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa.

Indexed as

Global HealthSnake BitesAnimalsHumansModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID42640884
PMCPMC13505955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.