ArticleOphthalmic research2026
Patient and Neighborhood Factors Influencing Participation in a Personalized Glaucoma Coaching Program.
Article in Ophthalmic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study was to assess barriers and facilitators to program engagement for participants in the Support, Educate, Empower (SEE) Personalized Glaucoma Coaching Pilot Program and identify differences by demographics or neighborhood area deprivation.
methodsThis mixed-methods study analyzed SEE glaucoma coaching program participants. Patient characteristics included age, sex, race, and neighborhood socioeconomic status (area deprivation index [ADI]). Interview transcripts were coded using the adapted Penchansky and Thomas framework, which defines healthcare access through access dimensions: availability (supply of services), accessibility (location), accommodation (organization of services), affordability (cost), awareness (communication/information), and acceptability (attitudes and comfort), to categorize barriers and facilitators. Thematic frequencies were calculated and stratified by participant characteristics.
resultsThe 44 participants in the SEE pilot program were 52% ≥ 65 years old, 55% male, 46% White, and 34% lived in high ADI neighborhoods. Awareness (100%) and acceptability (66%) were the most cited themes. Low-ADI participants experienced more acceptability (79% vs. 39% high ADI) and awareness barriers (79% vs. 43% mid ADI). Mid-ADI participants had more accessibility barriers (71% vs. 13% low ADI) and accommodation facilitators (43% vs. 8% low ADI). High-ADI participants reported more patient-level facilitators (44% vs. 14% mid ADI). No differences emerged by other demographics.
conclusionAmong SEE pilot program participants, acceptability barriers and awareness facilitators were the most frequently cited. There were ADI differences for barriers and facilitators. Neighborhood factors should be considered when implementing glaucoma coaching programs, as program interaction varies by these characteristics. The SEE pilot program facilitated glaucoma medication adherence through educational resources and adherence monitoring tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.