ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Reconstruction of an extinct soundscape reveals ultrasonic communication in the Jurassic.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reconstruction of an extinct soundscape reveals ultrasonic communication in the Jurassic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Very little is known about the acoustic landscape of long-gone environments, such as the Jurassic forests. The sounds made by dinosaurs and other charismatic vertebrates are not definitively known because their vocal organs rarely preserve well in fossils. Unlike tetrapod vocal cords, the sound-producing organs present in the sclerotized cuticle of some arthropods do fossilize well. For example, the stridulatory structures (file, plectrum) can be observed and measured in the fossilized forewings of male crickets and allies. These fossils incorporate a fingerprint of the acoustic signals they generated, offering a unique window into the soundscapes of the past. While call frequencies can be inferred from fossilized wings using phylogenetically informed predictions, the reconstruction of wing vibrations and the songs' temporal patterns from fossil material remains elusive. Integrating phylogenetics, laser Doppler-vibrometry, numerical simulations, and an AI-based approach, 20 ensiferan fossils (nine species) from a single location (Jiulongshan Formation, Inner Mongolia, China) were studied to recreate the acoustic landscape of the Middle Jurassic. These insects produced pure-tone calls, an adaptation to avoid localization by eavesdropping predators. They also exhibited rich diversity in their calling song frequencies and repertoires, facilitated by specialized file morphologies and wing-size variation. One species called above 20 kHz, suggesting that ultrasonic communication in insects was established long before the emergence of bats in the Eocene. Evolving mammalian hearing thresholds suggest early predators imposed acoustic pressures before bats. This arms race with singing ensiferans likely drove Jurassic insect song diversity and the evolution of mammalian and insect auditory systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.