ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2026
Artifact segmentation using the U-Net architecture for powder X-ray diffraction images.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing inference of segmentation on high-resolution images in MLExchange.The Journal of supercomputing · 2025Article
- qlty: handling large tensors in scientific imaging deep-learning workflows.Software impacts · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern synchrotron X-ray facilities generate X-ray diffraction (XRD) image data at rates that far exceed the capacity of manual analysis, yet critical processing steps such as artifact removal rely on human intervention. Rule-based algorithms in standard beamline software cannot reliably distinguish harmful artifacts like single-crystal diffraction spots from desirable features like preferred orientation, which leads to incorrectly processed data. We demonstrate that a U-Net convolutional neural network trained on expert-labeled experimental data can help automate artifact segmentation in time-resolved XRD measurements of battery materials. To address overfitting from redundant time-series frames, we introduce a mutual information-based pruning algorithm that selects maximally diverse training images. Our optimized model achieves an 85.1% true positive rate on a fully held-out battery dataset while reducing false positives by 34% compared with GSAS-II. Critically, the model preserves preferred orientation features that GSAS-II incorrectly removes, preventing systematic underestimation of phase intensities in downstream analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.